|
Case History Report
Water Treatment
"Non-chemical Device"
Device Evaluated
"Moltek Series",
manufactured by Moltek Environmental, Inc., 76 Sutton Road, Webster, MA 01570,
phone: 508.949.6035
System Data
Moltek Series I water
stabilizer systems were installed on a cooling tower and chiller system used for
process cooling at Continental PET Technologies, Inc., (CPET) Bedford, NH. The
Moltek system consisted of a non-chemical device (NCD), a mechanical type unit,
installed on the cooling water systems at the CPET plant. The CPET Bedford plant
is a plastic moulding operation that uses a cooling tower system to provide
recirculated water for machine, compressor, and chiller cooling; and a chiller
unit to provide chilled water for mould cooling.
Claims Made
Moltek NCD literature claims that
it "minimizes bacterial growth", "rust and corrosion are restrained and kept at
very low levels", "existing scale deposits will be removed-no new scale will
form", "negligible algae growth", "no biofouling or biological slime buildup",
and "microorganism counts are kept at minimum levels" via mechanical agitation
of the treated water. The CPET plant was cited in the literature as a
successful installation.
History
Two Moltek NCD systems were
installed in mid-1994 on the cooling tower and chilled water systems. Makeup
was untreated City of Bedford water with the cooling tower system operated at 10
cycles. PCT personnel visited the site in August 1995, and obtained water
samples. During the visit, plant personnel noted that they were very concerned
about the evident severe corrosion and deposition taking place in both the
cooling tower and chilled water systems.
Analytical Data
Laboratory results were
obtained as follows on the samples:
| Parameter |
Makeup |
Chiller |
Cooling Tower |
| pH su |
6.01 |
6.24 |
7.05 |
| total alkalinity mg/l |
7 |
71 |
65 |
| conductivity mmhos |
170 |
1540 |
1550 |
| calcium mg/l |
6.2 |
25.0 |
23.6 |
| iron mg/l |
0.04 |
1.3 |
0.08 |
| suspended solids mg/l |
<1 |
578 |
18 |
| total hardness mg/l |
19.2 |
95.0 |
91.1 |
| saturation index 100 F |
-3.52 |
-1.77 |
-0.102 |
A sample of deposited
material was obtained from the chilled water system and analyzed. The laboratory
reported that the foulant was 84.3% iron hydroxide, "rust".
Discussion
Moltek literature claims
that their NCD minimizes scale and corrosion by control of the saturation index
using mechanical agitation of the water. The treatment chamber "will enforce a
pH saturation in the water at which non-scaling conditions and minimum corrosion
conditions are ... maintained". It "affects the solubility of the calcium
carbonate in the water by regulating pH and carbon dioxide value." A further
claim is made that it precipitates "calcium carbonate and chemicals" from
solution so that they can be removed periodically, or filtered from the water.
The means of corrosion
control is explained by "corrosion is minimized ... by high mineral
concentrations ... and retarded by a thin film of calcium carbonate ... which
serves as a cathodic inhibitor."
Bacterial growth is
controlled by a "high shear zone (within the NCD)--that physically ruptures"
bacteria, "release of kinetic energy in the contact chamber -- producing free
radicals" which kill bacteria, and the high mineral concentration resultant from
elimination of blowdown that "retards bacteria growth"
The analytical data clearly
shows that the makeup water, as well as the chilled and cycled cooling waters,
are all very corrosive, having negative saturation index values. We thus would
expect both water systems to experience severe corrosion of ferrous metals, with
fouling from deposition of corrosion products. This is exactly what has been
experienced at the CPET plant, severe corrosion has occurred in the year since
installation of the Moltek NCD and fouling with corrosion products, iron
hydroxide (rust), has partially blocked much of the piping and the heat
exchangers.
Conclusion
Installation of the Moltek
Series I NCD at the CPET plant has shown that this particular unit cannot
control ferrous metal corrosion in either a closed loop chiller, or a
standard open cooling tower, with a corrosive makeup water. This conclusion is
based on the observed serious corrosion and deposition problems at the plant.
The claimed ability to
control scale formation is also open to question based upon our knowledge of
water chemistry. Physical agitation of water, no matter how "strong", has a
minimal effect upon various water properties and none upon the factors
controlling scale formation. The additional comment in the literature that the
unit controls scale by precipitation is interesting in that operation with scale
forming waters at high cycles, as recommended, will often put the cooling water
into the pH range were calcium will bulk precipitate via carbonate cycle
reactions. These particular reactions have absolutely nothing to do with
operation of the device and have been known for over 100 years.
Reporter
Timothy Keister, FAIC, CWT
|